Science journalism · Not medical advice Regulatory window · PCAC review in 42 days

Topic hub

Longevity

Longevity is a crowded space, and most of what's in it is noise. The peptide side of the conversation is more interesting than average — partly because some of the mechanisms are well-understood, partly because the FDA-approved GHRH analogues give you a clinical track record that most longevity compounds lack entirely. MOTS-c, Epithalon, GHK-Cu are in a different category: the mechanistic data is compelling, the human data is minimal. This hub covers all of it, with evidence levels attached to every claim, so you can tell the difference.

Join the waitlist

State of the evidence

The longevity peptide corpus centres on three mechanisms: GH/IGF-1 axis modulation (Ipamorelin, Sermorelin, CJC-1295), mitochondrial activation (MOTS-c, Epithalon), and cellular protection (GHK-Cu, Selank at the stress interface). Human data exists for the GHRH/GHRP class — approved analogues in this family carry a clinical track record from prescription use. For the mitochondrial and neuroprotective peptides, the evidence is mostly animal and cell-line. The longevity application is biologically plausible. It's also largely unproven in humans.

Signal snapshot: